🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant forecast – not just the winner overall, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters favored Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the system frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were large groups of ballots that came in later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world in which yesterday turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However the winner added half a million votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Plus he boosted his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year backed the progressive this year. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to surpass half. He’s at just over 50% but remain around 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I hope he achieves it so afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even Tottenville in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many conservatives on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it before Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported the independent. Thus there was a little resistance. But overall, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential there. Similarly in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.