🔗 Share this article

In the eyes of a lifelong Dodgers fan and third-generation Mexican American, the crowning highlight of the baseball championship did not happen during the tense finale last Saturday, when her team executed multiple dramatic escape feat after another and then winning in overtime over the opposing team.

It came a game earlier, when two supporting players, the Puerto Rican player and the Venezuelan infielder, executed a electrifying, game-winning play that simultaneously challenged numerous negative misconceptions touted about Hispanic people in the past decades.

The play in itself was stunning: Hernández raced in from the outfield to snag a ball he at first misjudged in the bright lights, then threw it to second base to secure another, game-winning out. Rojas, positioned nearby, caught the ball just a split second before a runner collided with him, sending him to the ground.

This wasn't just a great sporting achievement, perhaps the decisive shift in momentum in the Dodgers' favor after appearing for most of the games like the underdog side. For Molina, it was exhilarating, politically and culturally, a badly needed uplift for Latinos and for Los Angeles after months of enforcement actions, troops patrolling the neighborhoods, and a steady drumbeat of negativity from national leaders.

"Kike and Miggy presented this alternative story," said Molina. "Everyone saw Latinos displaying an infectious enthusiasm in what they do, being key figures on the team, having a distinct kind of confidence. They are bombastic, they're cheering, they're taking off their shirts."

"This represented such a contrast with what we observe on the news – enforcement actions, Latinos detained and chased down. It's so easy to be demoralized these days."

However, it's entirely straightforward to be a team fan nowadays – for her or for the many of other Latinos who attend regularly to home games and fill up as many as half of the stadium's fifty thousand seats each time.

A Complicated Connection with the Team

After intensified enforcement operations began in Los Angeles in June, and national guard troops were deployed into the area to respond to resulting protests, two of the local sports clubs quickly issued messages of solidarity with affected communities – but not the Dodgers.

Management has said the Dodgers want to stay away of politics – a view influenced, possibly, by the fact that a significant minority of the fans, including some Hispanic fans, are supporters of certain leaders. Under considerable public pressure, the organization later pledged $one million in support for individuals personally impacted by the operations but issued no official criticism of the government.

Official Event and Historical Legacy

Months earlier, the organization did not delay in accepting an offer to celebrate their 2024 World Series victory at the official residence – a move that sports columnists described as "pathetic … weak … and contradictory", given the team's boast in having been the pioneering major league team to break the color barrier in the mid-20th century and the regular references of that history and the principles it embodies by officials and present and past players. A number of players including the manager had expressed reluctance to travel to the event during the initial period but then changed their minds or gave in to pressure from the organization.

Business Control and Fan Conflicts

An additional issue for fans is that the Dodgers are owned by a large investment group, Guggenheim Partners, whose investments, as per sources and its own published balance sheets, involve a stake in a detention corporation that runs enforcement facilities. The group's leadership has stated many times that it aims to remain neutral of political matters, but its detractors say the silence – and the financial stake – are their own form of compliance to certain policies.

These factors contribute to significant mixed feelings among Latino supporters in particular – sentiments that surfaced even in the excitement of this season's hard-fought championship triumph and the following outpouring of Dodgers pride across Los Angeles.

"Can one to root for the Dodgers?" area writer Erick Galindo agonized at the beginning of the playoffs in an elegant essay pondering on "Dodger blue in our blood, but uncertainty in our minds". Galindo was unable to finally bring himself to view the championship, but he still felt deeply, to the point that he decided his one-man protest must have given the team the luck it required to succeed.

Distinguishing the Team from the Management

Many fans who have Galindo's reservations seem to have decided that they can continue to back the players and its roster of global stars, featuring the Asian megastar a key player, while expressing disdain on the organization's corporate leadership. At no place was this more clear than at the victory celebration at the home venue on the following day, when the capacity crowd roared in support of the manager and his athletes but booed the team president and the chief executive of the investors.

"The executives in suits don't get to claim our players from us," the fan said. "We've been with the Dodgers for more time than they have."

Past Context and Community Impact

The issue, however, runs deeper than just the team's present proprietors. The agreement that brought the Brooklyn Dodgers to the city in the late 1950s involved the municipality demolishing three low-income Latino neighborhoods on a hill above downtown and then transferring the property to the organization for a fraction of its market value. A track on a mid-2000s album that chronicles the story has an low-income worker at the stadium stating that the home he forfeited to eviction is now a part of the field.

A prominent commentator, possibly southern California most influential Mexican American columnist and media personality, sees a more troubling side to the long, dysfunctional relationship between the franchise and its audience. He calls the Dodgers the popular snack of baseball, "a corporate entity with an excessive, even harmful devotion by too many Latinos" that has been shortchanging its fans for years.

"They've acted around Hispanic followers while picking their pockets with the other hand for so long because they have been able to avoid consequences," the writer wrote over the summer, when demands to boycott the organization over its lack of reaction to the raids were contradicted by the uncomfortable fact that attendance at matches remained steady, even at the height of the demonstrations when the city center was under to a evening curfew.

Global Players and Community Connections

Distinguishing the squad from its corporate owners is not a easy matter, {