🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous women joined a collective professional network test this week after viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers experienced favorable results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where the same content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."